03 Honda Accord LX I4 Autotragic
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:47 am
I've been driving this car since early May and am ready to give a review on it. Overall a good car but not as good as I expected, despite having been around it for years and driven it on many occasions.
Performance: - 3/5: Definitely not a fast car and I find it easier to drive slowly than quickly. I think the main culprits are the DBW throttle (if it's not DBW it sure acts like it) and the autotragic transmission, but it also is a 3000 lb. car with a 160 hp motor - powerful 10-15 years ago but pretty mediocre at best for cars these days. It can go somewhat quick if I hold the gas down. I haven't driven a manual 03+ Accord but I'd imagine they are much better and easier to drive quickly. The auto is a 5 speed, but it is also an auto and one that is too smart to be manipulated like the older Honda auto trannies (i.e. my old 93 Accord LX auto)...
Features: - 4/5: If I cared much about extra features like moonroofs, rims, 20 airbags, CD changers and power leather seats, I'd give it a 3 or lower, but it has everything I need and is missing very little I'd really like to have that I'd actually use. You can open the windows by turning the key 2-3 times to the right in the driver's door. I wish I could do it from the key fob but I don't really need that...
Comfort: - 3/5: I personally find the driver's seat uncomfortable, but I find most driver's seats uncomfortable. The other seats are all decent. Other people seem to like the seats but my sister also dislikes the seats on this generation Accord but likes her new 2011 seat. The heat and A/C work well but it's often hard to get it set at the right temperature or right vents or right fan speed for ultimate comfort. The car handles pretty well but it also has a somewhat stiff ride and you feel a lot of the bumps. New tires that got good ratings for comfort (and other things) helped some, but it's still no Volvo (or Camry). I've had a 91 Corolla, a 93 Accord, a 94 Civic, a 98 Maxima and a 96 Accord and I don't find this Accord to ride much nicer than any of those. If anything, the 93 Accord rode nicer than all 5 of the others...
Economy: - 3/5: I didn't realize how much the car was still worth when I suggested taking over the 03 Accord. Apparently it's still worth $7k USD even with 100k miles. Damn Hondas don't lose their value. Gas mileage is not as good as most of my older cars, averaging 25-28 mpg mixed driving and I have gotten 30-36 all highway. Very rarely do enough highway driving to get over 28 mpg though, even when I pussyfoot around. The low gas mileage surprises me since the 03 Accord got the new K series (K24A4) engine which should do better than the older F23, but it could be the way I drive it or something that needs to be replaced/cleaned in the engine or drivetrain...
Interior: - 3/5: The interior is pretty plain. The seats are ok lookswise and almost everything is in the right place, but it's nothing fancy (yes, i copied most of this from another review but it's how I feel about my interior too). There are nice pockets in the doors for drinks and decent cupholders in between the seats. Road noise is worse than I'd like, even with new tires that got good ratings for road noise, not terrible but you know you're not in a luxury car most of the time (or I do at least). Passengers usually like the car and one even thought it was brand new, so maybe I'm just picky/sensitive to little things.
FOSE: - 4/5: Nice big backseat (backseat's pretty comfy too), decent room even with the front seats moved back. You could also fold down the rear seats and use the trunk and seatbacks, if you're into that... Decent room up front too. No vibrating stick for her pleasure (and it not being a van or hatchback), one of the only possible drawbacks I can think of...
Overall: - 3/5: Decent car with decent looks. I love looking at it even when other people find it bland. Interior looks nice. Performance, fuel economy, comfort and ride could be much better, but it could just be me...
Performance: - 3/5: Definitely not a fast car and I find it easier to drive slowly than quickly. I think the main culprits are the DBW throttle (if it's not DBW it sure acts like it) and the autotragic transmission, but it also is a 3000 lb. car with a 160 hp motor - powerful 10-15 years ago but pretty mediocre at best for cars these days. It can go somewhat quick if I hold the gas down. I haven't driven a manual 03+ Accord but I'd imagine they are much better and easier to drive quickly. The auto is a 5 speed, but it is also an auto and one that is too smart to be manipulated like the older Honda auto trannies (i.e. my old 93 Accord LX auto)...
Features: - 4/5: If I cared much about extra features like moonroofs, rims, 20 airbags, CD changers and power leather seats, I'd give it a 3 or lower, but it has everything I need and is missing very little I'd really like to have that I'd actually use. You can open the windows by turning the key 2-3 times to the right in the driver's door. I wish I could do it from the key fob but I don't really need that...
Comfort: - 3/5: I personally find the driver's seat uncomfortable, but I find most driver's seats uncomfortable. The other seats are all decent. Other people seem to like the seats but my sister also dislikes the seats on this generation Accord but likes her new 2011 seat. The heat and A/C work well but it's often hard to get it set at the right temperature or right vents or right fan speed for ultimate comfort. The car handles pretty well but it also has a somewhat stiff ride and you feel a lot of the bumps. New tires that got good ratings for comfort (and other things) helped some, but it's still no Volvo (or Camry). I've had a 91 Corolla, a 93 Accord, a 94 Civic, a 98 Maxima and a 96 Accord and I don't find this Accord to ride much nicer than any of those. If anything, the 93 Accord rode nicer than all 5 of the others...
Economy: - 3/5: I didn't realize how much the car was still worth when I suggested taking over the 03 Accord. Apparently it's still worth $7k USD even with 100k miles. Damn Hondas don't lose their value. Gas mileage is not as good as most of my older cars, averaging 25-28 mpg mixed driving and I have gotten 30-36 all highway. Very rarely do enough highway driving to get over 28 mpg though, even when I pussyfoot around. The low gas mileage surprises me since the 03 Accord got the new K series (K24A4) engine which should do better than the older F23, but it could be the way I drive it or something that needs to be replaced/cleaned in the engine or drivetrain...
Interior: - 3/5: The interior is pretty plain. The seats are ok lookswise and almost everything is in the right place, but it's nothing fancy (yes, i copied most of this from another review but it's how I feel about my interior too). There are nice pockets in the doors for drinks and decent cupholders in between the seats. Road noise is worse than I'd like, even with new tires that got good ratings for road noise, not terrible but you know you're not in a luxury car most of the time (or I do at least). Passengers usually like the car and one even thought it was brand new, so maybe I'm just picky/sensitive to little things.
FOSE: - 4/5: Nice big backseat (backseat's pretty comfy too), decent room even with the front seats moved back. You could also fold down the rear seats and use the trunk and seatbacks, if you're into that... Decent room up front too. No vibrating stick for her pleasure (and it not being a van or hatchback), one of the only possible drawbacks I can think of...
Overall: - 3/5: Decent car with decent looks. I love looking at it even when other people find it bland. Interior looks nice. Performance, fuel economy, comfort and ride could be much better, but it could just be me...
