Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

A place to post photos and discuss your car.
Post Reply
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

Edit 2011-08-15: If you're new to this thread, good luck...it's really long and boring. See also my photo albums, videos, and other links about the car:
https://sites.google.com/site/hackensteinberg

Original post:
This project is named as such:
Christine - like the Stephen King book/movie. Wife named the car that because she hits her head getting in it every time.
slo - It's going to be the opposite of fast.
Hack - Obvious.
enstein - As in Frankenstein ("That's Fronkenshteen!")
berg - My Jewish grandfather bought it brand new, and I'm doing this project very cheaply (and am partially motivated by money).

Car: 1980 Buick LeSabre Limited 4.1 V6 TH350 auto. Grandpa bought it new. It's got ~38,000 miles on it. The carburetor has given me quite a bit of trouble. Everything else is great.

Plan: Install a T5 from a Chevy S10. The S10 T5 has its shifter in a position that's compatible with my bench seat.

I acquired the S10 donor truck already. Anyone wanna buy a 2.2L I4? Starts right up, runs strong, surprisingly torquey.

Expected difficulties: Too many and too detailed to list, at the moment. I'll clear some of them up after I drop both transmissions.
Last edited by theholycow on Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

What's this rusty thing on my TH350's passenger side?
Image

What's this rusty thing on my TH350's driver side?
Image
Image

I'm pretty sure this is the speedometer takeoff on my T5. Is that for electronic or mechanical speedometer?
Image
Edit: I think that's mechanical. That could be a huge lucky break for me, making it plug-and-play. OTOH that also may mean I have no idea what transmission it is (since it's definitely not original to the 1994 S10)...hope it has ratios I'll like.
Edit 2: Confirmed. http://www.customclassictrucks.com/tech ... to_04.html
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
LHOswald
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2787
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:46 pm
Cars: '99 Civic Hatch w/B16a
Location: Enfield, Connecticut

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by LHOswald »

just hack the shit out of everything on the auto transmission. as long as your not gonna need it, and your not gonna damage anything else...who cares?
Image
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

The TH350 is worth some money (drag racers love 'em) so I'm not going to destroy it. Anyway, the stuff I posted was just about learning...I can't help but wonder WTF those things are.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11607
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by Rope-Pusher »

theholycow wrote:The TH350 is worth some money (drag racers love 'em) so I'm not going to destroy it. Anyway, the stuff I posted was just about learning...I can't help but wonder WTF those things are.
That rusty thang was the external sex organ of a turbohydramatic 350. I would say that it hasn't mated in many years. Cover yore arse when you crawl under the car.
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
DKaz
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:25 pm
Cars: Mazda3, Matrix, R3
Location: Coquitlam, BC

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by DKaz »

Nice, good luck! Will the T5 be able to handle all that extra power?
09 Mazda 5 GS 6MT - His
12 Mazda 3 GS-L Skyactiv 6MT - Hers

ImageImage
LHOswald
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2787
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:46 pm
Cars: '99 Civic Hatch w/B16a
Location: Enfield, Connecticut

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by LHOswald »

a t56 would've been better...but definitely much more work and much more money
Image
94Corolla5Speed
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 6927
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:51 pm
Cars: 1994 Corolla, 1990 Miata
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by 94Corolla5Speed »

You should grab a few bottles of engine brite and go nuts on the engine bay and under it. It will make your life so much easier when all that grease is off.
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

I identified the thingies:

- The one on the passenger side is the Transmission Modulator (could it have a more generic name?). It's the thing that adjusts shift points based on vacuum, so that it shifts at low RPM when you're easy on the gas and high RPM when you're laying on it hard.

- The one on the drivers side is the governor. Its job is to force the shift at high RPM if you're running WOT or if the modulator's broken.

On power:
The 4.1 is rated: 125 hp (93 kW) @ 4000 rpm 205 lb·ft (278 N·m) @ 2000 rpm
The 2.2 is rated: 118 hp (88 kW) 138 lb·ft (187 N·m)
So, yeah, it is a lot more torque for the tranny to handle. Common reports on performance forums say that the basic T5 (not the "World Class" series that is tougher) is good for around 200 lb-ft...and that's for guys who are beating on it. It ought to be fine for me. I would be ecstatic if it lasts 40,000 miles, and I won't be too disappointed if it fails after 15,000 miles.

On T56's: I would JIMP. I would need to change the 2.73 rear end on the car for that, though.

On degreasing: You are correct, sir. I intend to do some degreasing. I have a gallon of purple degreaser somewhere that I'll probably try using with a pressure washer, but buying Engine-Brite is not out of the question.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
watkins
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 15880
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:42 am
Cars: '08 Saab 9-5 Aero wagon
Location: Salem, MA

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by watkins »

Purple Power is god!
DKaz
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:25 pm
Cars: Mazda3, Matrix, R3
Location: Coquitlam, BC

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by DKaz »

It seems the T5s were used in the 85 and 86 Chevy Astros with the 4.3L V6 producing 200HP, not sure about torque, but it'll probably be fine.
09 Mazda 5 GS 6MT - His
12 Mazda 3 GS-L Skyactiv 6MT - Hers

ImageImage
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

Wikipedia says those 4.3's were good for 230 ft-lb in their 155hp configuration. I bet the 200hp had at least as much torque, probably a lot more.

The stronger "World Class" T5 didn't come out until 1988, so those Astros had a T5 of similar rating as mine. As I suspected, I ought to be fine.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11607
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by Rope-Pusher »

theholycow wrote:Wikipedia says those 4.3's were good for 230 ft-lb in their 155hp configuration. I bet the 200hp had at least as much torque, probably a lot more.

The stronger "World Class" T5 didn't come out until 1988, so those Rastros had a T5 of similar rating as mine. As I suspected, I ought to be fine.
Rastro? Rusn't he a rog, Reorge?
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by theholycow »

Not all Rastros are Rogs. I'd guess those 200hp 4.3's were pretty peppy...and then there's this:
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
Chris H.

Re: Project Christine slo Hackensteinberg

Post by Chris H. »

theholycow wrote:Not all Rastros are Rogs. I'd guess those 200hp 4.3's were pretty peppy...and then there's this:

^ Wow
Post Reply