Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Read the FAQ and still not sure about something? Want to shift faster? Post here.
Tinton
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3086
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:01 pm
Cars: 91 MR2t, 88&86 Fieros
Location: GA

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by Tinton »

You're noobs. The crank is the strongest part of the engine? Go run your engine out of oil and then see what your bearings do :lol:.
Image
User avatar
Bawked
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2417
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:24 am
Cars: 08 JDM Subaru Impreza STI
Location: New Zealand

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by Bawked »

i went down to .5 quartz and the bloody engine still lived :evil: stupid toyota bloody engines....
<3 fwd
User avatar
RITmusic2k
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2078
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:32 pm
Cars: 2004 BMW 330i ZHP
Location: Anaheim, CA
Contact:

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by RITmusic2k »

i went down to .5 quartz
That reads really weird. Like you partially crystallized your crankshaft or something.

BUt man, I know what you mean about those Toyota engines refusing to die...

My girlfriend tore a 4" wide gash out of the bottom of her Corolla's oilpan and managed to drive the car ten minutes back to her apartment on a dry engine. The car started the next morning. She'd still own it today, but her mechanic offered her $500 for the car as-is so he could fix it and resell it himself.
handydandy
Junior Standardshifter
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:49 pm

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by handydandy »

if you are starting in first and you dont add enough gas, making the engine fall under the idle rpm and sputter (but saving it from stalling) count as lugging? i do this frequently when i change my shoes (weird i know)...and i can hear/feel the engine almost die...
is this lugging? or bad?

i have acura tsx btw.
User avatar
RITmusic2k
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2078
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:32 pm
Cars: 2004 BMW 330i ZHP
Location: Anaheim, CA
Contact:

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by RITmusic2k »

No, that's "almost stalling". Lugging would be flooring it with the clutch fully engaged and the engine speed relatively low (say between 1000 and 1300 rpms for example). And the higher gear you do this in, the worse it is.

So, if you were cruising in 5th gear and you coasted down until the engine speed was at 1100rpm, then floored the gas to speed back up, you'd be lugging the engine until it got up to a more comfortable speed.
User avatar
theholycow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 16021
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:36 pm
Cars: '80 Buick LeSabre 4.1 5MT
Location: Glocester, RI
Contact:

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by theholycow »

RITmusic2k wrote:Lugging would be flooring it with the clutch fully engaged and the engine speed relatively low (say between 1000 and 1300 rpms for example). And the higher gear you do this in, the worse it is.

So, if you were cruising in 5th gear and you coasted down until the engine speed was at 1100rpm, then floored the gas to speed back up, you'd be lugging the engine until it got up to a more comfortable speed.
Actually, no. See Prodigal Son's post on the first page of this thread:
viewtopic.php?p=91271#p91271
In a very old car those would be appropriate instructions to cause lugging, but lugging is predetonation caused by those conditions. Modern cars are protected against it with variable ignition timing and knock sensors.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT

Put your car in your sig!

Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
User avatar
RITmusic2k
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2078
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:32 pm
Cars: 2004 BMW 330i ZHP
Location: Anaheim, CA
Contact:

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by RITmusic2k »

Back on pg.3 of this thread I addressed that. There is a spectrum of opinions on what constitutes lugging. The less severe definition (which is my side) is still severe enough to be addressed.
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by ClutchFork »

Lugging engine is like beating on your main bearings with a hammer, well not quite the same, but it does pound them in a way they were not designed to be run. Also pounds the rod bearings, scuffs the cylinder walls, and all sorts of other bad things happen. Lug all the time and surely you will cut engine live in half, quarter, or worse. :shock:
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
User avatar
Shadow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3384
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:51 am
Location: New York

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by Shadow »

Image
Image
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by ClutchFork »

:lol: I couldn't help myself :lol:
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
tankinbeans
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 4029
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:04 pm
Cars: 17 Mazda6 To, 18 Mazda3 i
Location: Shakopee, MN

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by tankinbeans »

Shadow wrote:Image
It does bring more awareness to the thread. I know I'd never seen it before because it was old when I got here.
17 Mazda6 Touring
18 Mazda3 iSport
InlinePaul wrote:The driving force of new fangled features to sell more cars [is to] cater to the masses' abject laziness!
Image
User avatar
Shadow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3384
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:51 am
Location: New York

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by Shadow »

tankinbeans wrote:
Shadow wrote:Image
It does bring more awareness to the thread. I know I'd never seen it before because it was old when I got here.

Yeah, that's fine. The thread predates me too, so it's nice to see stuff that was discussed long ago. But at the same time, there have been quite a few more recent discussions about engine lugging and exactly what it is and how it's harmful. In fact, I've had more than one debate with Cow about that very subject. He feels that lugging doesn't happen on a modern engine and I don't agree with him at all. :?
Image
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by ClutchFork »

Tinton wrote:You're noobs. The crank is the strongest part of the engine? Go run your engine out of oil and then see what your bearings do :lol:.
Yeah, the crank is very strong, especially if it is forged, but the bearings have a very thin and delicate surfacing which if scrubbed or hammered off will soon cause nasty scoring of the main bearing journal surface on the crank.

People sometimes run an engine (typically an inline six) without oil until it dies and then proclaim it lasted half an hour or whateve it is, but if they shut it down partway though that process or even after a couple minutes of running without oil and try to save it by refilling it and going on their merry way, I would bet that enginew will have much lower oil pressure than it had to begin with.

My F150 saw a lot of grit from a construciton zone for a 3000 mile oil change interval where the pcv hose fell off and the engine was sucking raw air. Oil analysis showed lead at 476 ppm! :shock: That is right off of the main bearing shells. After fixing the hose, the next couple oil changes showed lead at 126 ppm, then about 66. But the end result was my oil pressure suffered a drop of about 8 psi from 44 to 36 on the hot at 2000 rpm. I attribute that directly to the grit treatment.
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
User avatar
bk7794
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1561
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:16 am
Cars: 00 Civic (Stock)
Location: Central CT

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by bk7794 »

InlinePaul wrote:Lugging engine is like beating on your main bearings with a hammer, well not quite the same, but it does pound them in a way they were not designed to be run. Also pounds the rod bearings, scuffs the cylinder walls, and all sorts of other bad things happen. Lug all the time and surely you will cut engine live in half, quarter, or worse. :shock:
I wonder what is considered lugging the engine. I guess I'd rather slip the clutch and replace that sooner than to replace the engine.

Your topic brings to mind this question in my head. Impact or a torque wrench for the main pulley bolt. New thread time!
2004 Honda Accord 2.4 5 Speed
1989 Ford Taurus SHO 5 speed
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11615
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Why is Lugging Engine Bad?

Post by Rope-Pusher »

bk7794 wrote: Image
I wonder what is considered lugging the engine.
Fickset
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
Post Reply