Why 91?

Off-topic posts, quotes of the day and anything else you just would like to vent to the world. PG-13 or below PLEASE!
LS1Leader
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 2:17 pm

Post by LS1Leader »

Sypher wrote:
LS1Leader wrote:
3) Might as well do it. Didn't realize that there was a speed limiter at all on 'Vettes.
actually most cars have a speed limiter on them when they are manufactured. I have yet to see one without it. I guess it's either a government required thing or that it's the manufacture's safeguard agaisnt people overworking the engine...
I don't think it's required. My SVX (92 model year only) had no speed limiter, and was power limited at ~140-145 mph. Similarly, the LS1 F-Bodies that came with the uprated tires had no speed limiter either, and will top out from ~155-170 mph on power, depending on who you ask. :roll:
LS1Leader
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 2:17 pm

Post by LS1Leader »

starshifter wrote:Thanks for the advice LS1! I'll make sure that he doesn't delete the low octane maps.
Normally, he shouldn't, but I've seen some interesting tuning philosophies lately. :roll:
Johnf514
Moderator
Posts: 8574
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:59 pm
Cars: '07 Mazda3, '06 Ninja 636
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Post by Johnf514 »

Care to elaborate, LS1?
2007 Mazda3
Mods: 15% tint, Eibach ProKit
2006 Ninja 636
Mods: NOS & sidecar
LS1Leader
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 2:17 pm

Post by LS1Leader »

On which previous rant/ramble of mine? :)
Johnf514
Moderator
Posts: 8574
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:59 pm
Cars: '07 Mazda3, '06 Ninja 636
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Post by Johnf514 »

The various tuning philosophies, as it might be quite an interesting topic. :wink:
2007 Mazda3
Mods: 15% tint, Eibach ProKit
2006 Ninja 636
Mods: NOS & sidecar
LS1Leader
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 2:17 pm

Post by LS1Leader »

Not really... some rookies want to copy the high octane table over the low octane table, so that even if the car detects knock, it doesn't run rich, etc. This is great if you've already got a perfect tune and always get good gas, but it eliminates the safety factors built into the whole anti-knock system. While this may be nice if you don't have a tuning tool handy and always want to make sure you're running in a fully optimized mode, it's impractical if you can tune it right back to the way it was before the knocking (i.e., by having a backup copy of your most optimized tables), in the case of knocking mucking your "good" tune.
starshifter
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:37 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by starshifter »

I've seen reputable people doing mail order tunes who ask you if you want it optimized for premium gas. Hopefully, that doesn't simply mean deleting the low octane fuel maps. I was expecting that they'd have better optimized maps that they could replace the stock high octane maps with. Of course there's always the issue of memory. Maybe they want to add higher (like 93-94) octane maps and don't have room to do so unless they delete the 87-88 octane maps.

I don't know how much RAM (or PROM) my 99 PCM has. My guy says the 99-02 OS files are all 512kb or less. The 03-04 OS files are about 1mb. Yet, he seems confident he can upgrade me to the 2003 OS. The 04 OS wouldn't work because the chip wiring is different. The 01-03 PCM is a different part # than the 99-00 PCM, but the wiring is the same. My guy's own car is a 00 Camaro and he upgraded himself to the 02 OS as he wasn't sure about 03 at the time. He now seems to know that 03 would fit on my chip. I guess if we find out that it doesn't during the install, we can always start again with 02 instead.
Image
LS1Leader
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 2:17 pm

Post by LS1Leader »

I haven't heard of memory being an issue. My understanding is that tuning for premium gas would simply overwrite the current high octane table. Either way, mail order from a big company wouldn't be my recommendation. At worst, I would get the car remotely tuned by a personal tuner. But even that would require that you have the tuning software and can load the tuner's data in and provide the tuner with more outputs as feedback to further improve the tune.
starshifter
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:37 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by starshifter »

LS1, my guy is a local tuner. If you have one nearby, I agree that it's much better to work with one than with the mail order people. I was using the mail order people as an example. Anyway, in my case, cost would be about the same either way.
Image
Louisville Slugger
Junior Standardshifter
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: Shrewsbury/Fitchburg, MA

Post by Louisville Slugger »

My 1993 Geo Prizm LSi 5 SPD says it requires 91 in the manual:

http://www.supload.com/free/Manual.jpg/view/
Paolo300zx
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3184
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:03 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Contact:

Post by Paolo300zx »

Up here there 87, 89, 92, and 94, i put in 92, but i will occasionaly put in 94 if i'm feelin lucky :D
Johnf514
Moderator
Posts: 8574
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:59 pm
Cars: '07 Mazda3, '06 Ninja 636
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Post by Johnf514 »

Louisville Slugger wrote:My 1993 Geo Prizm LSi 5 SPD says it requires 91 in the manual:

http://www.supload.com/free/Manual.jpg/view/
A Geo that drinks fine spirits . . . I've never seen that! :shock: :wink:
2007 Mazda3
Mods: 15% tint, Eibach ProKit
2006 Ninja 636
Mods: NOS & sidecar
Post Reply