My Audi A4 is the very first car I've had with a turbocharger. I've known about boost gauges for a while, but have started thinking about what said gauges actually do. Most of the websites I've read say something along the lines that:
A Boost Gauge is a necessary tool for keeping tabs on how well your engine is functioning
A Boost Gauge will give you a better feel for fuel consumption
Boost should never exceed 101.3 kPa/1 Bar/15 PSI/760 Torr/any.other.nonstandard.pressure.unit.equalling.atmospheric.pressure
Should I get one? If so, is there a good (i.e. useful and not exorbitantly expensive) gauge to get?
ClutchDisc, that's a vacuum/boost gauge. Previous owner used it for vacuum gauge duty only, obviously. It can be useful, but nowhere near as useful as some people think in a modern fuel-injected engine like yours. Its position appears just right for dekneecapitating you in a crash.
I have a vacuum gauge for my car, but mine has a mechanical carburetor for which vacuum is one of the most important control signals.
zenfiz6, I suspect that a boost gauge can be mildly useful in an unmodified car with OEM turbo and is quite necessary in a car that has an aftermarket turbo, or an OEM turbo with its boost cranked up, or heavy modifications.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT
Put your car in your sig!
Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
All turbo cars should have a boost gauge, in my opinion. Why? Well, it's an extremely useful gauge to have. It will alert you early on if you have a boost leak that develops. And don't underestimate the usefulness of the vacuum gauge that's part of the boost gauge. A good vacuum gauge is an incredibly important tool for any mechanic. If you have any doubts, just look up how many conditions that can be diagnosed with just a vacuum gauge.
But to answer you question---no, you don't need a boost gauge. If you did, Audi certainly would have provided one in the first place. Is it a useful gauge to have? Absolutely. For many reasons. That said, ECS just recently came out with a relatively inexpensive boost gauge for the B8 Audis. It's a vent-mounted gauge, very similar to the AWE unit, but it uses a different vent and it's less expensive.
theholycow wrote:ClutchDisc, that's a vacuum/boost gauge. Previous owner used it for vacuum gauge duty only, obviously. It can be useful, but nowhere near as useful as some people think in a modern fuel-injected engine like yours. Its position appears just right for dekneecapitating you in a crash.
Yea, I know. It is in a very odd location. But it's over enough that I think it would be pretty hard to hit it in a crash.. the picture makes it look like it's closer to the knee area than it really is.
09 Mazda 5 2.3 5-speed manual 171k
11 Subaru Forester auto 113k
92 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 5-speed manual 151k
Shadow wrote:All turbo cars should have a boost gauge....
But to answer you question---no, you don't need a boost gauge....
Is it a useful gauge to have? Absolutely....
I'll second the OBDII recommendation. ScanGauge II, ScanGaugeE, UltraGauge, or even better (but more trouble; also far less cost) a smartphone with Torque and an OBDII bluetooth dongle.
I have this one: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005NLQAHS but this one is half the price and may be the same http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004B7YXOM -- but both are a fraction of the price of a ScanGauge II, which I also have and which is nowhere near as capable or useful. The UltraGauge may be less expensive than the SGII, and the SGE is definitely less expensive but is kinda lame by comparison.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT
Put your car in your sig!
Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
theholycow wrote:I'll second the OBDII recommendation. ScanGauge II, ScanGaugeE, UltraGauge, or even better (but more trouble; also far less cost) a smartphone with Torque and an OBDII bluetooth dongle.
I've always been a little leery of the BlueTooth solutions. I thought I read somewhere that update rates were on the order of 1 Hz....
zenfiz6 wrote:I've always been a little leery of the BlueTooth solutions. I thought I read somewhere that update rates were on the order of 1 Hz....
That's OBDII in general, not Bluetooth. My ScanGaugeII's refresh rate is actually worse than the bluetooth device, but that's not because of Bluetooth, that's just because of better OBDII hardware in that device than in the SGII.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT
Put your car in your sig!
Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD
zenfiz6 wrote:I've always been a little leery of the BlueTooth solutions. I thought I read somewhere that update rates were on the order of 1 Hz....
That's OBDII in general, not Bluetooth. My ScanGaugeII's refresh rate is actually worse than the bluetooth device, but that's not because of Bluetooth, that's just because of better OBDII hardware in that device than in the SGII.
My dad has a bluetooth OBDII reader that works with an app on his phone. His (and I don't know the app name) works were you can buy all of the codes for 1 car for relatively cheap, or unlimited cars for like $30-40. And the reader itself is dirt cheap compared to other readers. I don't know about monitoring functions like is applicable here, but his is useful from the maintenance side of things (and can reset codes, too).
'15 Mazda 3 iSport Hatch 6MT
'11 Ford Fiesta Hatchback SE 5MT
'14 Giant Escape City 24MT '97 Honda Civic EX 4AT - Retired @ 184,001 mi
zenfiz6 wrote:I've always been a little leery of the BlueTooth solutions. I thought I read somewhere that update rates were on the order of 1 Hz....
That's OBDII in general, not Bluetooth. My ScanGaugeII's refresh rate is actually worse than the bluetooth device, but that's not because of Bluetooth, that's just because of better OBDII hardware in that device than in the SGII.
SG lags a bit, but for fear of stating the obvious - have you increased the refresh rate? You can do that on the SG. It's set to 'normal' from the factory and you can increase to 'high'.
Squint wrote:My dad has a bluetooth OBDII reader that works with an app on his phone. His (and I don't know the app name) works were you can buy all of the codes for 1 car for relatively cheap, or unlimited cars for like $30-40. And the reader itself is dirt cheap compared to other readers. I don't know about monitoring functions like is applicable here, but his is useful from the maintenance side of things (and can reset codes, too).
That sounds awfully expensive. A $10-20 OBDII Bluetooth dongle and the $5 Torque Pro app can do all of that, as well as a bunch of data logging. The free Torque Light can probably do most of it too.
AHTOXA wrote:SG lags a bit, but for fear of stating the obvious - have you increased the refresh rate? You can do that on the SG. It's set to 'normal' from the factory and you can increase to 'high'.
Been there done that. I don't remember if it wasn't a very big help or if it wasn't compatible. Anyway my point was that Bluetooth doesn't introduce lag.
1980 Buick LeSabre 4.1L 5MT
Put your car in your sig!
Learn to launch/FAQs/lugging/misused terms: meta-sig
watkins wrote:Humans have rear-biased AWD. Cows have 4WD