I go back and forth regarding rules changes. I always want F1 to be one of the fastest formulae (sp?) out there, but I would like to see some more wheel to wheel action. Sometimes it's difficult finding a bridge between the two.
I do disagree with the comment on slicks. They mean a lot in terms of raw speed. I somewhat agree, but definitely see your point regarding harder compounds...however I don't want to see GT style braking zones that are massive (relatively). I'd like to think that when you are at that level, you can pass under most circumstances...however that isn't always the case, eh?
On a side note, I met Antonio Pizzonia today!
F1: The Good, the Bad, the Mediocre?
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 9:14 pm
- Location: VA, USA
- Contact:
Re: F1: The Good, the Bad, the Mediocre?
I agree F1 should be the fastest formula, but absolutely there is a compromise between pure speed, safety, cost control and competative passing - a great racing series needs all these.
My racing blog: aracingdream.com
Re: F1: The Good, the Bad, the Mediocre?
For the americans on this board: how are you guys watching races this year? it's not like ESPN airs them...
"why are there three pedals?"
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 2472
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:48 am
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 9:14 pm
- Location: VA, USA
- Contact:
Re: F1: The Good, the Bad, the Mediocre?
speed channel coverage is decent.
if you don't like that, download the international feeds here: http://www.racing-underground.com/
if you don't like that, download the international feeds here: http://www.racing-underground.com/
My racing blog: aracingdream.com
Re: F1: The Good, the Bad, the Mediocre?
speed channel my ass, that stuff cost money :X
"why are there three pedals?"